The digital anti-piracy laws: a breakdown
a February 2012 article for The Minnesota Daily, Jeff Hargarten examined the global and U.S. legislative efforts to combat online piracy, highlighting the controversies surrounding several proposed laws and treaties.
-
SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act): Aimed at blocking access to foreign websites offering pirated content by requiring U.S. search engines to remove them from results and prohibiting payment services from processing transactions for them. Critics argued it promoted online censorship and placed undue responsibility on internet companies.
-
PIPA (PROTECT IP Act): Sought to empower the U.S. government and copyright holders to block access to websites hosting pirated materials, particularly those outside the U.S., by restricting domain name access and search engine listings. Opponents raised concerns about free speech and the potential for overreach.
-
ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement): A multinational treaty intended to enhance enforcement of intellectual property rights across borders. Its secrecy during negotiations and potential implications for internet freedom led to widespread protests, particularly in Europe.
-
OPEN (Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act): Proposed as an alternative to SOPA and PIPA, this bill focused on cutting off funding to piracy websites through payment processors and advertisers, without mandating search engine censorship. It garnered support from major tech companies like Google and Facebook.
-
TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership): A free-trade agreement that included provisions for stricter intellectual property enforcement, raising concerns about its impact on digital rights and access to information.
The article underscored the tension between protecting intellectual property rights and preserving internet freedom, noting that while some lawmakers and industries supported these measures, public outcry and advocacy from digital rights groups led to the postponement or reevaluation of several proposals.
